The Queen was prepared to intervene before the Scottish independence referendum in 2014 to help boost support for the Union, according to reports.
A new book by Lionel Barber, the former editor of the Financial Times alleges that he was told by the Duke of York just one week before the vote that the Queen was preparing to step in.
The monarch, 94, told people in Scotland to "think very carefully about the future" ahead of the vote, and now Barber has claimed the comments were part of an orchestrated plan to deter voters from backing the Yes campaign.
"I can tell you that down in London they panicked," he told The Sunday Times.
"There is this scene where I am at Buckingham Palace invited by the roguish Duke of York to lunch with the Chinese foreign minister, and Andrew suddenly half lets loose that the Queen is going to intervene on the Sunday.
"They had clearly planned it... it was very artfully done. I'm sure that David Cameron did the same thing which he later did with Barack Obama who he got to intervene on Brexit.
"I bet, and I can't prove it, that he made a desperate SOS call to Buckingham Palace to set that Sunday thing up... Andrew knew about it."
The SNP has called for the Queen to "remain steadfastly neutral" in a second independence referendum.
READ MORE: SNP told to bin draft independence referendum bill amid 2021 calls
SNP MP Tommy Sheppard told The Times: "This is shocking and extremely concerning.
"If true, it means that political pressure was applied to the Queen to press her into areas where the monarch should not go.
"I would hope that the palace would be able to give reassurance that the Queen will remain steadfastly neutral in the next referendum."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel